updated
November 8, 2006
A winning advocate knows the
importance of creating a polished, professional-looking brief that is an
accurate and easy-to-use reference tool for the court. A winning advocate
also knows that if a judge's attention to the contents of the brief is
distracted or frustrated by its format, the brief's power to persuade is
diminished.
The increasing sophistication
of law firm computers, printers, and word processing software has had a
notable effect on the judge-reader's expectations for the quality of finished
briefs. Almost every brief
is prepared in-house, using the law firm's word processing equipment. This approach saves costs,
but it also permits the lawyer to work right up to the filing deadline.
Computers crash, fatigue prevents close proofreading, and the result can
be a brief that is an embarrassment, rather than a credit, to the lawyer
and firm who produced it.
Why
should you know how to format a brief?
Increasingly, lawyers use their
computers to draft and print briefs themselves, even if they have the luxury of working
for firms with experienced litigation secretaries who already know how
to conform the brief's draft to fit the conventions and requirements of
the court. It is also true that many lawyers find themselves
training inexperienced staff to produce briefs that won't run afoul of
the court's rules or the settled expectations of the judge-reader. Finally,
thanks to technological "advances" that provide more ways than ever to
work outside the office (e.g., laptop computers, pagers, cell phones, e-mail, on-line research from home computers), attorneys are
working more nights and weekends (without benefit of secretarial
help who would earn overtime pay!).
These tips will help you
put together a professional and polished-looking brief. Some of the "tips"
are mandated by court rule or this course's formatting
requirements for briefs; others are not required by any rule, but will result
in a more attractive brief. First impressions do count. A sloppy brief
detracts from your credibility. The judge may think, "If this person is
so careless with form, the content is probably substandard too."
To go straight to any particular
topic, just click below:

 | Covers
and binding: |
Follow the court's rules
for covers and binding. Use cardstock or heavier weight paper for
your covers. Federal court rules mandate certain colors for the brief covers
-- blue for appellant, red
for appellee; Arkansas appellate courts do not care what color you
use.
Arrange the cover information
neatly and attractively. It's your decision whether to center all the information
or to arrange in some other manner. Use "white space" or divider
lines to separate items on the cover.
Bind
the brief so that there is no risk any pages will come loose.
Check your court rules for binding requirements. There are several
acceptable methods: e.g., staple-and-tape, spiral, comb. Any full-service
copy center can bind your briefs. The copy centers in downtown Little Rock
have lots of experience in binding court briefs, and their services are
relatively inexpensive. The Moot Court office has binding machinery, but
will not hand out supplies. Prof. Barger often has re-cycled materials that
you can use. See her if you would like to bind your briefs here at the law
school.
Sample Cover for
Appellant's Brief in Federal Court
Case No. 2006-7501
|
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
|
|
Luisa Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs.
Fayetteboro Blood Bank, Appellee.
|
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Arkansas
United States District Judge Atticus Hawk, Presiding
|
|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF
|
|
Coleman Gerber
McNeale, Gerber, and LeBoem, L.L.P.
1211 Central Boulevard
Fayetteboro, AR 77772
(501) 555-0122
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT
|
Sample
Cover for Appellee's Brief in Federal Court
Case No. 2006-7501
_____________________________________________
|
In the United States
Court of Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit
_____________________________________________
|
Luisa Rodriguez, Appellant
Fayetteboro Blood Bank, Appellee
____________________________________________
|
Appeal from the
United States District Court
for the Northern District
of Arkansas
Honorable Atticus Hawk,
Presiding
____________________________________________
|
Brief of the Appellee,
Fayetteboro Blood Bank
____________________________________________
|
|
Ulysses
Yooler
Yooler Law Firm
Flying W Corporate Center,
Suite 519
1205 McAlmont Street
Big Stone, AR 72202
(501) 555-9957
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
|
Sample Arkansas Appellate Brief
|
Case No. 2006-55
|
|
IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
|
|
In the Matter of the Adoption of
A.T., a Minor
|
|
Appeal from the Quapaw County Circuit Court
Honorable Ardath Malone, Presiding
|
|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF
|
|
Carole G. Bremen
Arkansas Bar No. 88900
Bremen Law Firm
1101 Kinkaid Street, #523
Fayetteboro, AR 72099 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT,
M.T. Poketz
|
return to topics
 | Page
numbering: |
Suppress page numbering
on the brief's cover. In fact, you may elect to set up your cover as a separate
document from the rest of the brief, with no page numbering at all. If
you have saved various parts of the brief as separate documents, you will
have to adjust the page numbering on each so that it will be consecutive. For
that reason, it's better to merge all sections of
the brief into a single document.
Begin page numbering with
the first white page of the brief itself. Use small roman numerals (i,
ii, iii, iv) for all the preliminary sections of the brief that do not
count against your page limit (e.g., Table of Contents, Table of Authorities).
For Arkansas briefs, Prof. Barger recommends
that you separately number the Abstract with either a footer that identifies
the pages as "Abstract 1" or with some sort of abbreviation used with the
page number (e.g., "A-1" or "Ab-1"). Because the Abstract does not have a page limit,
and because the clerk's office will need to count your Argument pages, this
numbering technique will simplify that job for the clerk.
Begin regular page numbering
of the substantive portions of the brief with page 1 (set page number "value"
to 1). Number pages at either the bottom center or bottom right.
Just a simple number will do. There is no need to put hyphens around the
number (-9-) or to insert the word "page" (Page 14).
 | Justification:
|
In printing, the term "justification"
refers to the way the words at the end of a line appear lined up straight
on the margin or whether the margin looks "ragged" (uneven). Your word
processor will probably have options for you to select left justification
(lined up on left, ragged on right), right justification (lined up on right,
ragged on left), or full justification (lined up both left and right).
Use
either left or full justification in your briefs. Many people
like to fully justify the print because it looks very neat and precise.
It's acceptable in Arkansas and in the federal courts; a few states' court
rules forbid it, however.
A word of warning: WordPerfect
versions 6.1 and above have a feature called "Make It Fit."
Don't. The
feature works by reducing margins, font size, line spacing -- all of which
will likely violate your court rules on formatting.
 | Indentation:
|
"Indentation" refers to
the practice of bringing a line in a certain space from the normal margins.
Indent the first line of every paragraph by one-half inch; use the
tab
key to do this. Never never never
hit the space bar 5 times; your indentations will be irregular from
paragraph to paragraph.
If you need to bring text
in an equal length from both margins (as when you are doing a block format
quotation), use the double indent feature
of your word processing program.
return to topics
 | Table
of Contents: |
The Table of Contents references
the beginning page for every major section of
the brief and every point heading and sub-heading. Any section the court rules
call for is such a major section (e.g., Table of Authorities, Statement
of the Case, Argument, Addendum). Be sure that your Table of Contents also
includes the title and beginning page number for each
item in the Abstract and/or Addendum. Every
point heading and sub-heading is a sign-post for a major section of the
Argument; include the page number where each such heading is found.
For ease of reading, consider
typing headings in normal type in the Table of Contents, even though you
have put them in caps, bold, italics, or underlining in the body of the
Argument. Duplicate the outline numbering system you've used for these
headings in the body of the Argument, and do indent the sub-headings.
Use dot
leaders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to connect the table
entry and the page or pages where it is located. Avoid manually typing
a period space period space etc. until you get to the right margin. You
will end up with a wavy line at the right margin.
Do not crowd text into or
over the space for page numbers. Use plenty of white space to make your
tables attractive and easy to read. Remember that no court rule mandates
a page limit for your tables. Either double indent the entry or hit the
"enter" key to go to a new line.
Sample Point Heading
I. Cottontree's Chemical Screen Test Policy fails Vernonia's efficacy requirement because
the policy requires all students to submit to drug testing but penalizes only those students who drive to school. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
return to topics
 | Table
of Authorities: |
The Table of Authorities
must reference the location of each full citation and
short form used anywhere in the substantive portions of the brief.
For Arkansas briefs,
this means to reference citations not just in the body of the Argument,
but also any citations used in support of the Points on Appeal. Do not,
however, reference an authority mentioned only in a parenthetical to another
citation. It is also unnecessary to reference authorities that appear only
in the Abstract or Addendum.Put the full citation (including
subsequent history, if any) into the table. The table entry for a citation
to an authority using page numbers should provide only
the page on which the cited authority begins,
not
the
authority's pinpoint page numbers.
If an authority is cited
at so many pages in your brief that you'll have more than two-thirds of a line of
page number references, use the abbreviation passim
instead of giving the page numbers. (The term tells the reader that this
authority is practically everywhere!) But don't get carried away: Use passim
sparingly, if at all. The judges who read your brief want to be able to easily
find the authorities you have cited. Italicize or underline passim, according to
whether you are using italics or underlining in your citations.
Group
your authorities by category (e.g., cases, constitutional provisions,
statutes, rules, secondary authorities). Unless court rules require it,
do not break cases down into sub-categories by jurisdiction (U.S.
Supreme Court, Federal Circuits, State Courts). This practice
unnecessarily complicates the table's usefulness and may irritate the
judges reading your brief, as it forces them to try to remember which
court decided a case or to look in several places for the citation they
need.
Alphabetize
the entries, or if they are numeric, put them in numerical order.
If they are alpha-numeric, organize by whatever comes first, the letter
or the number (e.g., put Ark. Code Ann. references before N.Y. Gen. Oblig.
Law before Vt. Stat. Ann. Put 5 U.S.C. § 1440 before 23 U.S.C. §
205.)

For cases,
alphabetize by the first party name.
If more than one case begins with the same name (e.g., United States),
then organize by the opponent's name (e.g., United States v.
Leon
before United States v. Lynch before
United States v. Sakowskie).
For secondary
authorities, alphabetize by the author's
last name, even if you are following citation rules for writing the author's name in normal order, firstname lastname. Thus,
the table will put Zachary Abramson ahead of Abigail
Zimmerman.
Because citations are
almost always long enough to take up most of a line, you can use a
"hanging indent"-style format to attractively format them. (In a
hanging indent, the top line is at left margin; the succeeding lines of
the citation are indented beneath.) If you find that the length of the
citation is running into the area for the table's page numbers, hit
"enter" and indent again. Your goal is to keep from crowding the area
for page numbers.
Sample Entries for Table of
Authorities
Chandler v. Miller,
520 U.S. 305 (1997) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 9, 10, 12
Maitland v. University of Minnesota,
155 F.3d 1013 (8th Cir. 1998). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Todd v. Rush County Sch.,
133 F.3d 984 (7th Cir. 1998). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
13, 14, 18, 21
 | Widows
and orphans: |
Use your word processing program to prevent "widows
and orphans." This phrase refers to a single line of text from a paragraph that
is standing alone at the bottom or
top of a page. Set the word processing program to always
keep at least two lines of text together.
 | Safeguarding
your work from computer demons:
|
Save
your work in more than one place, and back up often. Computers been known to crash right before a brief's filing deadline. Disks
become corrupted. E-mail a copy to yourself. Print out
a hard copy from time to time; if all else fails, you can scan your
printed draft.
return to topics
|