It’s Time for the Civil Justice Sequel to Gideon v. Wainwright: Indigent Civil Litigants Deserve Appointed Legal Counsel

COMMENT–It’s Time for the Civil Justice Sequel to Gideon v. Wainwright: Indigent Civil Litigants Deserve Appointed Legal Counsel By Mark P. Yablon* It is hard to believe courts did not universally provide attorneys to criminal defendants unable to afford counsel until Gideon v. Wainwright in 1963[2] or to arrestees until Miranda v. Arizona in 1966.[3] … It’s Time for the Civil Justice Sequel to Gideon v. Wainwright: Indigent Civil Litigants Deserve Appointed Legal Counsel

Patently Unfair: The Tensions Between Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection

COMMENT–Patently Unfair: The Tensions Between Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection by Zachary A. Hale* I. Introduction With globalization and international trade policy in the political spotlight, questions about how intellectual property protection impacts the enjoyment of human rights are of increasing importance to the national and international political discourse. In recent decades, the relationship … Patently Unfair: The Tensions Between Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection

Mixed Signals: An Analysis of the Third-Party Doctrine as Applied to Warrantless Collection of Historical Cell Site Location Information

NOTE–Mixed Signals: An Analysis of the Third-Party Doctrine as Applied to Warrantless Collection of Historical Cell Site Location Information by Caitlin Campbell* “For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what … Mixed Signals: An Analysis of the Third-Party Doctrine as Applied to Warrantless Collection of Historical Cell Site Location Information