Can True Parity Really Be Achieved? A Proposal for Behavioral Health Advance Directive Statutes with Bite

By David C. Jung   I. Introduction Consider the following scenarios: You are thirty-six years old and frightened. You were diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder five years ago and have been admitted to public psychiatric hospitals several times since. During your most recent hospitalization, your treating psychiatrist barely spoke English. No matter how hard you tried Can True Parity Really Be Achieved? A Proposal for Behavioral Health Advance Directive Statutes with Bite

How the 2012 Presidency was Determined a Decade Ago

By Robert Steinbuch[1] Republicans historically have had two powerful tools in presidential elections: opposition to taxes and increasing budget deficits.  Reagan assailed Carter as a big spender and promised to cut government.  Reagan trounced Carter, even though Reagan later wound up raising (and cutting) some taxes.  Four years later, Mondale exclaimed that he would raise How the 2012 Presidency was Determined a Decade Ago

Impact of the Decriminalization of Homosexuality in Delhi: An Empirical Study

Impact of the Decriminalization of Homosexuality in Delhi: An Empirical Study[1] Dipika Jain[2] Abstract: On July 2, 2009, the Delhi High Court read down Chapter XVI, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.  Prior to the Court’s ruling, Section 377 criminalized sexual activity “against the order of nature,”[3] and served primarily as a vehicle for Impact of the Decriminalization of Homosexuality in Delhi: An Empirical Study

Food v. Fuel: A Growing Conflict

In mid-August of this year, Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe and North Carolina Governor Beverly Eaves Purdue requested that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) waive a portion of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) of the Clean Air Act. At issue is the fact that the EPA sets annual volume requirements for certain renewable fuels – here, Food v. Fuel: A Growing Conflict

Catalysts for Change

The Arkansas Journal for Social Change ‘s Second Annual Symposium Co-hosted by HLSA Nov 8, 2013 Room 323 From 9AM-4PM Cause Lawyering and Use of Courtroom Interpreters Panel will count as 2 free hours of CLE credit E-mail [email protected] to register.

A View from the Third Tier: One Professor’s Preliminary Thoughts about Teaching Law Students

By Theresa M. Beiner   I am in my eighteenth year [1] of teaching at a law school that currently sits in the third tier of the U.S. News and World Report law school rankings.[2]  Over the years, I have been amazed by the amount of focus in legal academia placed on the needs and experiences A View from the Third Tier: One Professor’s Preliminary Thoughts about Teaching Law Students

Logic as the Lens of Faith: An Abductive Approach to Religious Conflict

  By Gary Slater [1] The logical method of abduction provides a constructive means of addressing religious disputes in public settings.  By allowing one to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate contexts in relation to the meaning of religious claims, such logic uncovers errant rules of reasoning among religious arguments without presuming to judge the truth Logic as the Lens of Faith: An Abductive Approach to Religious Conflict

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’s Commentary on Citizens United from the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission Conference

As part of its continuing coverage of Representing Hope: New Paradigms for Access to Justice, the Journal is pleased to present Justice Stevens’ capstone speech from the event. Appointed to the nation’s highest court in 1975, Justice Stevens served as a justice to the Supreme Court of the United States until his retirement in 2010. Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’s Commentary on Citizens United from the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission Conference